Originally Posted by
CABAL
This all sounds like twisted mess where councilmembers and staff aren't even on the same page.
Council demands people to engage predators on sight, because rules prevent them (preds) from actually starting a fight with more than one combatant and excuse that it is "LRP" to not try Kill Predators on Sight. But their rules allow them to employ the fullest of their gear potential when they are actually engaged on sight, but they aren't allowed to "abuse" it, but if this "abuse" happens, it is being prosecuted by the same council that imposes and has to obey those rules and might actually be guilty of abuse.
Oh, I wonder if this won't get abused, stuff like that never happens.
Its like the time when CIA investigated CIA and found no ties between CIA and drug trade, obviously.
Why even councils are separate from regular staff at this point? One would think that its for the cross-monitoring. Council watches over staff and staff watches over council. But council watches over itself and staff doesn't watch over council.
I fail to understand.
Arbitrary rules on top of arbirary rules with council watching itself to not bent those rules too much, while actuall staff is not allowed to interfere, unless it is somebody super high ranking (but I assume people in those position don't do it much because of high trust).
There really needs be an official statement about this stuff atleast. I would go so far as for making the pred honor code as clear as server rules are. There are no wiggle room (outside Role-Play rule where certain LRP behaviour might be excused by admeme if it makes a round fun) for server rules, why can't pred rules be the same?
"Yes, you can HPC dishonorable prey, but don't HPC too many dishonorable prey, because council of beetroot, no you can't engage more than one prey unless they engage you, because council of beetroot and its rules, but prey not engaging you on sight is LRP which is against server rules, but engaging you on sight lets you HPC them, but don't do it too much..."