I am going to take a moment to clarify a few things.
Most of the following is from my point of view.
You can 100% just pick out whatever you feel like helps your argument.
But I am not here to argue I am here to explain where in my opinion these issues are coming from.
The following is how I remember it and might not be the complete picture since I do not have that.
Ill give you the TL;DR in advance lack of communication.
This already started with the synthetic gen 1 removal.
Well, to be honest it started before that.
The number 1 thing I remember from councils being made is a fear of the power they would have.
I remember the vice host at the time SLC being quite clear about this.
Any whitelist council member can go back in the whitelist council channel to 17-10-2018 to see the conversation about it at the time.
Or the post that spooky made about this.
The entire point of view how it was presented from the start was an advisory role.
Ill be quite honest imo we are quite past that. And I am not saying that is a /bad/ thing.
It has the positive points of handling issues way quicker.
But at least fmpov the council's opinion is pretty much binding and referred too on a regular basis these times.
That imo is enough to at least explain where monkey was coming from.
In general we as a dev team had solid reasonings and reason to remove the gen 1's.
After the fact these were discussed with the council.
This is where I/we made a mistake imo. We are still not communicating with councils.
I had made the intention to be at council meetings at the time and have attended some.
But 2-6 weeks ago I had exams I have to pass to not fail my year.
In general I am all for more communication but
1. It is clearly an expectation and communication problem.
2. We are also running into an issue where we as a developer team are not the last developer team.
In general, I do not think that if any of us joined while councils were binding that that would be changed.
We are all trying our best here.
In general I do think we are more open/accepting and that it's only going to move more towards that.
And I feel as if a big part of the development team really wants to be open but just feels that we get loads more not needed negativity than needed.
While we are in my opinion doing great stuff and making good long term progress.
I am really sad that this happened in general.
Now, I want to get out ahead of this.
The predator council was informed that there was an fds about preds and this was revealed to them.
That draft was made by me and is a first version. The intention from me was to get my own WL and than work on it.
And there is 5 things before that on my list like the SG changes.
And the draft was mostly made in response to Dutch's Dozens.
I do not mind the fds being public but that's a huge disclaimer that should go before it.
And I prefer it kept not shared because it's a draft/work product.