Staff Report
Your BYOND Key DonOmet
Date of Incident August 8, 2019
Your Character Name? Austin 'Docs' Roe
Their BYOND Key AcuteCircle
Approximate time and date of the incident 3:40am
Which Staff Protocols (//showthrea...-and-Protocols) were broken Enforcement of the Rules
Description of the incident Before the incident, I started calling my version of Hyperzine "QUM Juice", the acronym simply means Quick Use Movement, so therefore it's Quick use Movement Juice, and I've been rolling with it since 8/6/2019, I thought everything was okay since everyone knew it was clearly a joke, and I even read the rules before calling it "QUM Juice", I believe it would've fallen under "Bravado" exception under the ERP 18+ rule section. It wasn't till I noticed that everyone knew it was a joke, and not distasteful joke that I kept using it. And I believe even a staff member also jumped on the QUM Juice joke train but I don't recall who it was. But cut to today, 1:40am PST the round had just started, and I was in the hallway when I saw the XO dragging a cat, I asked the XO, "Would you like some QUM Juice? It makes you faster.", I then proceeded to drop an injector labled "QUM Juice Autoinjector 6u". Shortly after that I was messaged the following by staff member "AcuteCircle", "Why are you calling it QUM Juice?", I replied back "Quick Use Movement, I coined the term 2 days ago and I've been rolling with it ever since.", shortly after I was messaged by AcuteCircle again saying "It's literally referencing Cum, you are aware we have an 18+ rule?", and I personally was shocked, I thought maybe the admin would jump in with the joke but apparently not. I messaged back shortly "Mate, it's a joke. Everyone knows it's a joke, even an admin made a joke about QUM Juice, I think you're taking it a bit too literally.", Then to end the whole feud, the Acute messaged me back saying "It's a joke that ends now, don't call it qum juice again.". I then proceeded to ask how I could dispute this and then Acute promptly set me up and helped me out. Now just to clarify, I think he handled it professionally and was very helpful, it's just his ruling under a very specific rule that bothers me.
EvidenceHow you would punish the accused I wouldn't give a punishment at all, simply because it falls under the Bravado exception under the ERP 18+ rule, and it had no correlation to CUM what so ever.