User Tag List

Page 9 of 10 FirstFirst ... 78910 LastLast
Results 81 to 90 of 97

Thread: Expected Contact RP Test

  1. #81
    Primordial Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    1,902
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by MasterShakeEZ View Post
    I always called them big black fuckers and ravagers big red fuckers. Anyone too stupid to know what im talking about can enjoy dying to the praetorian or ravager.
    Calling benos some racist terms <<< Calling benos Scrin names.

  2. #82
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    131
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by RobBrown4PM View Post
    I dislike the idea that the Falling Falcons are a penal battalion. Historically, penal battalions have not been entrusted with heavy equipment or technologies. I refuse to believe that a futuristic military would entrust a full ship, tanks, attack drop ships and heavy weapons to a penal battalion made up of the who's who of the nearest drunk tank and jail.
    Yeah, but you can easily say that:
    A: The shipside staff, MPs, and officers are not convicts. The ship itself is not in the hands of the actual rabble, they're just the ones being sent to the ground.
    B: It would explain why the single tank is an old rustbucket and the Captain needs to get special authorization from the DEFCON system in order to: get OB shells, get a proper tank cannon, allow Req to bring up more supplies from the hold.
    There is a strict, computerized system which determines how much of the equipment onboard the ship is actually allowed to be used. In a normal unit you'd think that, even were this system in place, the Captain would be allowed to authorize the use of more supplies in an emergency without needing to wait for a computer. But he can't, and the only explanation for that which makes sense is that HC cares more about saving money and supplies than they do about the actual lives of the marines on the ship. And that makes more sense if it's established that these marines are the dregs, and they're also worried about what they would do with that equipment. "You can't have a proper tank cannon because the computer says you don't need it" only makes sense if there's also the consideration of "the risk of these guys turning it back on the MPs is higher than the reward of letting them use it".

  3. #83
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Posts
    3
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by dauntasa View Post
    Yeah, but you can easily say that:
    A: The shipside staff, MPs, and officers are not convicts. The ship itself is not in the hands of the actual rabble, they're just the ones being sent to the ground.
    B: It would explain why the single tank is an old rustbucket and the Captain needs to get special authorization from the DEFCON system in order to: get OB shells, get a proper tank cannon, allow Req to bring up more supplies from the hold.
    There is a strict, computerized system which determines how much of the equipment onboard the ship is actually allowed to be used. In a normal unit you'd think that, even were this system in place, the Captain would be allowed to authorize the use of more supplies in an emergency without needing to wait for a computer. But he can't, and the only explanation for that which makes sense is that HC cares more about saving money and supplies than they do about the actual lives of the marines on the ship. And that makes more sense if it's established that these marines are the dregs, and they're also worried about what they would do with that equipment. "You can't have a proper tank cannon because the computer says you don't need it" only makes sense if there's also the consideration of "the risk of these guys turning it back on the MPs is higher than the reward of letting them use it".
    The main problem is that they don't really need that; the Marines get enough power behind them that it'd be child's play for them to overthrow command if they really wanted to. The tank alone could easily demolish CIC, and even if the TOs are loyal you still have the problem of the specs, especially grenadiers, the SGers (who are decently effective against groups due to the sheer amount of dakka they put out), and superior numbers in general.

    I would not trust a convicted felon with a flamethrower.

  4. #84
    Primordial Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    1,902
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Tarhalindur View Post
    The main problem is that they don't really need that; the Marines get enough power behind them that it'd be child's play for them to overthrow command if they really wanted to. The tank alone could easily demolish CIC, and even if the TOs are loyal you still have the problem of the specs, especially grenadiers, the SGers (who are decently effective against groups due to the sheer amount of dakka they put out), and superior numbers in general.

    I would not trust a convicted felon with a flamethrower.
    The fact is that Tank has no way to access CIC. And our "Flamethrower" is really "Flamesneezer". Convicts, conscripts, nearly mentaly unstable and simply overoptimistic idiots. That's what PFC's are.

  5. #85
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Posts
    156
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Well if Falling Falcons are a penal battalion that means that all PFC are convicts that were given the choice of serving as marines or a execution.

  6. #86
    Senior Member Steelpoint's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    285
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    A CM penal battalion concept is stupid, insane, and utterly at odds with the universe, reality, logic and sanity.

    Colonial Marines, not Warhammer 40k.
    This is war, survival is your responsibility
    Captain Alan Bentway
    Synthetic: Nicholas
    Hunter Kwei Ikthya-de

  7. #87
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    291
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I always saw The USS Almayer as the worst the USCM has to offer, used more as a punishment destination for troublemakers, useless and outcast marines. Always sent to the most dangerous missions and assignments just to get rid of them but somehow they�ve managed to success all the way to *the current round*

  8. #88
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2019
    Posts
    101
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Heckenshutze View Post
    I always saw The USS Almayer as the worst the USCM has to offer, used more as a punishment destination for troublemakers, useless and outcast marines. Always sent to the most dangerous missions and assignments just to get rid of them but somehow they�ve managed to success all the way to *the current round*
    Also the place where nepotistic officers get sent when their superiours can't get rid of them, but they can give them an assignment that will...

  9. #89
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Posts
    367
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Nyvrem View Post
    Also the place where nepotistic officers get sent when their superiours can't get rid of them, but they can give them an assignment that will...
    Yep there's longstanding traditions in most militaries to have a few assignments you can send people to where they'll do the least damage.

  10. #90
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2019
    Posts
    3
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Am I the only one who dislikes the results of this test? Rounds are much more meta and SL and SO seems like joke roles now cause almost everybody ungas.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •