User Tag List

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 31 to 35 of 35

Thread: Clarification on Department Heads not deploying and HIDDEN RULES

  1. #31
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Posts
    106
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The best part happens when the secret landmines conflict the actual written rules and an admin just ignores them to apply his own secret ruling.

  2. #32
    Ancient Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Posts
    572
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Watermelon914 View Post
    Clarifications are needed for niche scenarios, but they shouldn't be hidden to staff only.
    I agree that clarifications are necessary for certain occurrences, but yeah they need to be publicly viewable. Otherwise there's no point to having them, since people will keep making the same mistakes.

  3. #33
    Ancient Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    513
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    as CMP i basically never deploy unless the ship has to evac or there aren't any capable officers able to guard/prime the nuke

  4. #34
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Posts
    31
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Ok...I got a lesson in the past about rule lawyering, how ever I was 100% right, but still caught a ban for "arguing" the rule that i was accused for breaking. What are some better options instead of "rule Lawyering" we can do as players to defend ourselves? Are we really at the total mercy and grace of the staff?

  5. #35
    Ancient Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    513
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    if they dont want to argue, bring it up with a senior member of staff or file a staff complaint

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •