Originally Posted by
Paradoxal
Left this one for last! There's been plenty of rounds where marines were going good but lost steam. They lose steam because they have a more complicated health system. They have a need for resources. They have nothing that'll truly re-energize them in a lengthy battle. I've lost track of the times people have gone: "The Marines have managed to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory."
I mean, how is this a surprise? Xenos are working on unlimited supplies and it takes a handful of marines and the right equipment just to take out a single lurker. And unlike Xenos, which get to just hit you and run away, where even if they did a tenth of the damage you did to them, you'll have been drained of a resource - as little as it might've been - while they're just gonna run away and heal.
A Xeno dying is a loss, but due to the change in the aging system, it's not even as much of a loss as it used to be. If you die as, let's say, a lurker, you now just have to deal with the evolution system, which at most will keep you out for maybe five minutes and then you're back at full force.
The fact is, no, the IO wasn't overkill as we're seeing with how many rounds Marines are doing great and the Xenos are doing terribly, but Xenos just need that *one* win to drain substantial resources or manage to stoop the advance to a halt and skirmish. There's a reason why the meta rush has become the best way for Marines to win. It's because, unlike what you claim, it's not a "control points" game. It's a pure TDM game. There's no advantage to holding territory. There's not even territory. With how effective ambush classes are, even if there's a decent amount of marines, you might still get drained of resources.
While the DEFCON system had major issues, it at least was *something* to give that needed stamina Marines needed. And it also meant that Xenos couldn't just huddle in caves, outside of OB, as given enough time they'd get the nuclear option. These, by the way, are *side objectives*. Oh, and since that was one of the craziest things I've heard said: we still have side objectives. That's what researcher is, it just isn't nearly as good.