Which once again plays into my original question.
How can someone who is quite open both verbally and in writing.... holding a position of Dev Architect responsible with forwarding the development of the game for the playerbase while refusing to work on or develop an element of the game?
Compound this with additional issues of "He's just not good at communicating and you can't take his leadership seriously" which actually emphasizes him being unqualified.
It's like combining the two worst qualities for a position of "leadership" or "Manager" and somehow still getting the job despite this?
Once again, this post isn't about Fourkhan but rather how the Dev Architect position itself has an issue when someone who completely dislike an element of the game is incharge of the direction of the game.
This is a massive conflict of issue making them and anyone else of similar nature completely unqualified.
It's almost unbelievable to me that the people who should see an issue with this conflict either can't, don't care or are part of the problem themselves.