Originally Posted by
grinkgo
On the topic of allowing IC racism because you shouldn't "restrict roleplay," that argument falls flat if you apply it to other unaccepted forms of roleplay. Why shouldn't two players ERP? Well, it's against the rules and there are OOC punishments for ERP. But ERP could certainly be realistic in the right scenario. However as a community we decided that's not the type of roleplay we want in the server. Why shouldn't someone grief or RP as someone who goes on a batshit crazy killing spree? That's roleplay. Well, again that kind of behavior and roleplay isn't allowed on the server. Just like the ERP, there's an OOC punishment for IC griefing.
So regardless of whether or not I agree, this all begs the question of why the community is so intently focused on allowing IC racism? So what is it specifically about IC racism that's soo worth defending? And sure someone's gonna reply to this and say I'm comparing apples to oranges but that's all semantics. Particularly I just want to point out the principles of the argument. And I'm not really trying to present any kind of argument for or against, but I think it's just worth noting the general inconsistency with the "you shouldn't restrict my roleplay" argument. Roleplay can be and already is restricted and we all are fine with it. So what's really the reason for protecting racism roleplay?